Showing posts with label George Gillett. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Gillett. Show all posts
Thursday, 13 May 2010
Why I'm sick of being a LIVERPOOL FC fan
I NEVER thought I'd write this, but I'm sick of being a Liverpool fan.
Not sick of Liverpool FC: I still find myself staring at my ticket stubs or thumbing through an old programme and enjoying the fond memories of Istanbul, Dortmund, Cardiff, Barcelona; my first derby win or even my first game, a less than glamourous Rumbelows Cup win over Crewe.
I still feel the emotions rise when I watch the DVD of that night in the Ataturk and I still get riled when faced with a crowing Manc (although there's not too many of them about right now).
So as I say, I still love the club.
But the being a fan bit? Well I'm sick of the soap opera, peeved with the politics and right now the whole thing has left me feeling a bit worn out and fatigued; my passion has been sapped.
Months ago, I glanced at the fixture list and I'd mentally pencilled in the Hull game as a trip I'd be making.
End of season, day in the sun, couple of bevvies, a laugh, and hopefully a comprehensive victory for the Mighty Reds.
That's how it went in my head anyway.
But who was I kidding? I keep making that mistake – thinking football is still the way it used to be. It's not – not at Liverpool anyway.
The Liverpool I know had its heart ripped from it and thrown in the Mersey long ago. Now it's all about being pro-Rafa or anti-Rafa. About belonging to one forum but hating another. About blaming the owners for ruining our club or claiming it's an excuse. About believing the Rafa stories, the Gerrard stories or the Purslow stories – or not believing them.
All in all it's a whole lot of in-fighting and that has punched my enthusiasm in the solar plexus and left it rolling on the floor and gasping for air.
So I didn't go to the Hull match – didn't even try to get a ticket, and after briefly toying with the idea of tracking down an ale house screening it 'on the foreign', I settled for listening to Aldo and co on Radio City.
The match, well you know the score, depressingly familiar – Aldo sounded like he'd had enough, too.
It just washed over me, I was barely arsed. In fact, the most excited I got was when Chelsea went 2-0 up and I knew the Mancs wouldn't be lifting number 19. How sad is that?
So that was that and it was back to the politics. Rafa Benitez referring to "senior sources" on several occasions in his press conference, a clear reference to the planting of information in the media by those "senior sources". The same senior sources that took it upon themselves to talk about players with other clubs without the manager's knowledge.
That was like throwing a piece of meat to the hungry hounds – off we went again: the manager is out of order, Purslow is out of order, Rafa rubbed his hands together once (that really is a rumour going around, well part of it anyway), Gerrard doesn't care, Madrid want him, he's definitely going, it's Lucas's fault...and on and on and on until you're left rocking yourself in the darkness, mumbling and praying for mercy.
The thing is, if anyone is rubbing their hands together and thinking about money, it's Tom Hicks and George Gillett. Because while we slug it out amongst ourselves – falling out on forums, arguing in boozers, even scrapping at the match – they continue to rape and pillage our club relatively – in terms of our worldwide (or even match-going) support – unchallenged.
The debt is mounting up, the loan from the off-shore company to the club is growing – and what are the majority of our support doing about it? Nothing.
Yes, there's Spirit of Shankly – they've done a sterling job. They have sent out the message that Liverpool fans will not just roll over and have their belly tickled by the carpet-bagging American pair.
But their ranks contain approximately 5,000 members – a fraction of the people who attend Anfield regularly and a mere spec on the radar when global support for Liverpool is totted up.
So why are so many doing so little? Are they burying their head in the sand? Can they not concentrate long enough to get their head around what Hicks and Gillett are doing to the club? Or are they just buying the spin and waiting for Sky Sports to tell them about it?
There's so many messages flying around the world about Liverpool FC that perhaps they are just not hearing the right one – the one that says Hicks and Gillett are ruining our club, dragging it down from its perch with barely a kick or a scream and pointing it in the direction of the road Leeds and Newcastle took after financial mismanagement – the road to nowhere.
It's a road the club is on now, despite what new chairman Martin Broughton tells us. Something will happen in months, people are interested, he says. Exactly what managing director Christian Purslow told us when he arrived.
We've gained another suit, but as a club we're still shivering in the cold, stark naked, looking in at the Premier League and Champions League parties knowing we've got no chance of an invite.
Meanwhile, the banks have extended deadlines, the interest – at £110,000 A DAY – continues to mount and Hicks and Gillett sit thousands of miles away, sitting and waiting for the buyer that never comes.
But for some all that doesn't matter. They want Benitez out and Jose Mourinho in. It doesn't matter if we haven't got money, he's got to go and Jose? Well, he'll happily kiss goodbye to Inter Milan, ignore a possible offer from Real Madrid and walk into a club on its knees who will pay him less than he can get elsewhere. It would be career suicide. It makes no sense at all. But still people say it.
That kind of debate suits the Americans just fine. It's another distraction and another step away from what would really get them thinking – mass, organised protest. Boycotts. Pressure. More of the same from Spirit of Shankly only with more bodies behind them, more money in the coffers, more helping hands to get the wheels turning.
But for many of the tactics that would truly make them sit up and notice to work it needs the whole of the Liverpool support on board – and as it stands that support is so factious, that doesn't look like happening anytime soon.
Hicks and Gillett can turn to their PR firms (or those "senior sources") to keep the pot bubbling with distractions about players, managers and rubbing hands. It's divide and conquer - the oldest trick in the book. And it's working a treat.
But who needs PR firms when you've got rumours (a speciality of the City of Liverpool), forum 'insiders' and journalists happy to be spoon-fed information and reproduce it as 'fact' without questioning its validity?
It all keeps fans from coming together and fighting the cancer that is eating away at our loved one. And that's exactly what the profit-obsessed charlatans want.
Issue two of Well Red magazine is out later this month. Go to www.wellredmag.co.uk for more information.
Posted by
robbohuyton
at
00:55
Why I'm sick of being a LIVERPOOL FC fan
2010-05-13T00:55:00+01:00
robbohuyton
George Gillett|Liverpool FC|Spirit of Shankly|Tom Hicks|
Comments
Labels:
George Gillett,
Liverpool FC,
Spirit of Shankly,
Tom Hicks
Tuesday, 6 October 2009
SO WHAT'S GEORGE GILLETT ON ABOUT? FIGURE IT OUT
THERE'S a lot of people wrapping themselves up in knots about the stories that have appeared in the media today about George Gillett having a pop at Rafa Benitez.
Not at the amazing brass neck of the Liverpool co-owner saying Benitez is to blame if the club doesn't "move forward".
But at the media for daring to print an article that orginated on a Liverpool fans' forum.
Well what's the problem? It seems The Times first got hold of the story. And as at least three members of the sport team there are die-hard Liverpool fans, as well as excellent journalists, it's safe to say the origin of the story is a safe one.
So once they had established the authenticity of the source, what's wrong with printing it?
I think it's great - because, yet again, it shows up Gillett for what he is - a money-obsessed spin-doctor who doesn't appear to give a flying fuck about Liverpool FC.
Gillett, who along with Hicks has led the club during a period when debts have rocketed from £40m upon their purchase in 2007 to £240m now, interestingly claims he and Hicks have put in £128m PLUS the £30m recouped from the sale of Xabi Alonso.
And yet Benitez seemed to miss out on a string of targets from Gareth Barry to David Silva, Ryan Shawcross to Michael Turner. And we ended up with a bargain basement Greek in the twilight of his career. But apparently there was millions sitting there waiting to be spent.
Not adding up is it?
Gillett, who also claims it was Hicks not he that made the infamous "60 days until there's a spade in the ground" statement regarding a new stadium (the video below suggests otherwise), also said: "
Not at the amazing brass neck of the Liverpool co-owner saying Benitez is to blame if the club doesn't "move forward".
But at the media for daring to print an article that orginated on a Liverpool fans' forum.
Well what's the problem? It seems The Times first got hold of the story. And as at least three members of the sport team there are die-hard Liverpool fans, as well as excellent journalists, it's safe to say the origin of the story is a safe one.
So once they had established the authenticity of the source, what's wrong with printing it?
I think it's great - because, yet again, it shows up Gillett for what he is - a money-obsessed spin-doctor who doesn't appear to give a flying fuck about Liverpool FC.
Gillett, who along with Hicks has led the club during a period when debts have rocketed from £40m upon their purchase in 2007 to £240m now, interestingly claims he and Hicks have put in £128m PLUS the £30m recouped from the sale of Xabi Alonso.
And yet Benitez seemed to miss out on a string of targets from Gareth Barry to David Silva, Ryan Shawcross to Michael Turner. And we ended up with a bargain basement Greek in the twilight of his career. But apparently there was millions sitting there waiting to be spent.
Not adding up is it?
Gillett, who also claims it was Hicks not he that made the infamous "60 days until there's a spade in the ground" statement regarding a new stadium (the video below suggests otherwise), also said: "
Well, I was researching this for the day job today (thanks to those who pointed me in the direction of LFC History for figures) so George, let's do just that: (Figures since Gilett and Hicks took charge of Liverpool, February 2007)
"We spent more than the 20m cap in our budget, plus all the money from sales, so there was plenty of money, so any complaints you have you should take a look at the ins and outs. We have put £128 million in to buy players on top of what’s come in in the last 18 months.”
PLAYERS IN:
Javier Mascherano:£18m
Lucas Leiva £5m
Mikel San José Domínguez £270,000
Sebastian Leto £1.8m
Fernando Torres £20.2m
Andriy Voronin Free
Yossi Benayoun £5m
Ryan Babel £11,500,000
Charles Itandje Undisclosed
Emiliano Insúa £1.3m
Martin Skrtel £6.5m
Philipp Degen Free
Andrea Dossena £7m
Diego Cavalieri £3.5m
David N'gog £1.5m
Robbie Keane £19m
Albert Riera £8m
Glen Johnson £17.5m
Alberto Aquilani £17.1m
Sotirios Kyrgiakos £2m
Daniel Ayala Undisclosed
SPENT:£135.1million
PLAYERS OUT:
Florent S.-Pongolle £2.7m
Danny O' Donnell £100,000
Jerzy Dudek Free
Boudewijn Zenden Free
Robbie Fowler Free
Luis Garcia £4m
Djibril Cissé £6m
Craig Bellamy £7.5m
Mark Gonzalez £3.5m
Gabriel Paletta £1.2m
James Smith Free
Mohamed Sissoko £8.2m
Lee Peltier Free
John Arne Riise £4m
Harry Kewell Free
Anthony Le Tallec Undisclosed
Peter Crouch £11m
Danny Guthrie £2.25m
Scott Carson £3.25m
Steve Finnan Undisclosed
Robbie Keane £16m
Jack Hobbs Undisclosed
Paul Anderson £250,000
Jermaine Pennant Free
Miki Roque Free
Sebastian Leto £3m
Álvaro Arbeloa £3.5m
Xabi Alonso £30m
SOLD: £106.5m
NET SPEND IN HICKS&GILLETT’S REIGN:£28.6m
I'm no accountant (thankfully) but this doesn't seem to illustrate a spend of £128m plus the money that has come in does it?
And for those of you who (amazingly) think the suns shines out of Hicks & Gillett's arse - here's something else to consider (figures courtesy of Paul Tomkins)
SQUAD WORTH:
1. Chelsea £252.9m
2. Manchester United £215.4m
3. Tottenham £203.8m
4. Manchester City £165.9m
5. Liverpool £154m
6. Arsenal £92m
So for those of you who argue Benitez has had quite enough to spend, maybe a little food for thought?
Consider also, that Champions League participation is worth approximately £20m a year. And since Hicks & Gillett have been around we've always been in it.
So again, I'm failing to see where this alleged huge investment is. If you can enlighten me, please do.
Finally, I quote George Gillett one final time - then urge you to immediately watch the video below.
"Where have we lied? Where’s the lie, for Christ’s sake? In those 60 days, what happened to the world? I didn’t say that. Hicks was the one who said. 60 days? Bulls**t. That was not me. It’s wrong. I have never talked about that."
AVOIDING THE BULLSHIT: Today's recommended read - Paul Tomkins' rant
Posted by
robbohuyton
at
23:36
SO WHAT'S GEORGE GILLETT ON ABOUT? FIGURE IT OUT
2009-10-06T23:36:00+01:00
robbohuyton
George Gillett|Liverpool FC|
Comments
Labels:
George Gillett,
Liverpool FC
Tuesday, 25 August 2009
KNIVES OUT FOR RAFA - BUT WHO COULD DO BETTER?
The bookies, not content with stirring the shit with ANOTHER cock and bull story about betting being suspended on the Liverpool manager getting the axe, have now installed the Spaniard as favourite to be the next manager to get the chop in the Premier League.
Meanwhile, forums, blogs and newspaper reports are all beginning to circle Benitez, seemingly smelling blood.
And all this three, THREE, games into the season.
Yes, the first defeat at home in the league since December 2007 - and against a team aspiring to crack the top four - and that's it, time for a new manager.
Well I don't buy the culture of right now, or knee-jerk, as it is so often, and annoyingly, referred to as on the Internet.
It takes time, a shed-load of money and, more often than not, a string of nearly-but-not-quites to build a team capable of winning the league - just ask Alex Ferguson.
Once upon a time, before his every move was lauded as genius, plain old Alex was in a similar boat to Rafa - chasing the coat tails of a club that year after year was enjoying success and monopolising the league.
And like Rafa, the former Aberdeen boss had to cope with huge expectation, intensive media scrutiny and a support lacking patience.
It took Fergie SEVEN YEARS to land the league - and in that time he spent big money on a lot of players, and, like Benitez, not all of them were successful.
In the first three years under the Scot, United finished 11th, 2nd, 11th and come the 89-90 season, Fergie spent big again, smashing the British record to sign Gary Pallister for £2.3million (!).
But United went on to lose 5-1 to Man City before enduring an early season run of six defeats and two draws which led to a banner at Old Trafford saying: "Three years of excuses and it's still crap. Ta ra Fergie."
It's widely accepted that a Mark Robins goal in the FA Cup against Nottingham Forest saved Fergie's bacon (face).
And from there on, well it's painful reading for any Red - you know what's happened since.
If Rafa is sacked now - or walks - Liverpool go back to square one, new manager, new ideas.
Instead, Benitez should be given time and money - and a little respect for his record so far, in trying circumstances, wouldn't go amiss.
It takes time, a shed-load of money and, more often than not, a string of nearly-but-not-quites to build a team capable of winning the league - just ask Alex Ferguson.
Once upon a time, before his every move was lauded as genius, plain old Alex was in a similar boat to Rafa - chasing the coat tails of a club that year after year was enjoying success and monopolising the league.
And like Rafa, the former Aberdeen boss had to cope with huge expectation, intensive media scrutiny and a support lacking patience.
It took Fergie SEVEN YEARS to land the league - and in that time he spent big money on a lot of players, and, like Benitez, not all of them were successful.
In the first three years under the Scot, United finished 11th, 2nd, 11th and come the 89-90 season, Fergie spent big again, smashing the British record to sign Gary Pallister for £2.3million (!).
But United went on to lose 5-1 to Man City before enduring an early season run of six defeats and two draws which led to a banner at Old Trafford saying: "Three years of excuses and it's still crap. Ta ra Fergie."
It's widely accepted that a Mark Robins goal in the FA Cup against Nottingham Forest saved Fergie's bacon (face).
And from there on, well it's painful reading for any Red - you know what's happened since.
If Rafa is sacked now - or walks - Liverpool go back to square one, new manager, new ideas.
Instead, Benitez should be given time and money - and a little respect for his record so far, in trying circumstances, wouldn't go amiss.
Some might say he's had the time and money after five years in the job and £250million spent.
But that doesn't tell the whole story. Yes, he's spent big - but he's also clawed back a big chunk of that figure (approximately £134m).
So that's a net spend of £116m - or an average spend of £19.4m per season.
When you consider United have regularly forked out for £30m players - Veron, Rooney, Ferdinand, Berbatov, it's peanuts.
And of course, they started from a position of power when Benitez arrived - so while he had to overhaul the whole squad (of which just Gerrard and Carra remain), United strengthen when they need to - and almost always from the top end of the market.
On Monday, after returning from Anfield, and against my better judgement, I flicked open the lap top and began to read the reports, the blogs and the forums.
And there it was, the old chestnut: "Get Mourinho in".
Putting aside the fact that he is a attention-hungry media whore, the man is obviously a good manager.
But ask yourself this - given the constraints ANY manager of Liverpool will now have to work under thanks to Tom Hicks and George Gillett saddling the club with millions of pounds of debt, what difference would a change make?
There's no money to spend, Rafa is quite literally at the "haven't got to pot to piss in" stage.
We can't even get in a free or a loan to boost our attacking options (Eidur Gudjohnsen, anyone?) because there's nothing left to pay the additional wages.
Just think how useful that £40m blown on paying interest on loans the Yanks used to buy the club would be now.
But back to Mourinho.
Let's ignore the pay off to Inter Milan, the golden goodbye to Rafa for sacking him and the self-proclaimed Special One's wages, a reported £5.2million a year at Stamford Bridge.
Without the money to burn (he spent £70m on arrival at Chelsea to add to a team that was already in the higher reaches of the Premier League), what would the Portuguese motormouth do?
Don't get me wrong, I know Rafa makes mistakes - and his worse trait is being stubborn, almost shooting himself in the foot at times to prove his own point (not playing Crouch, and, at times Pennant, sticking with Lucas etc).
But I truly believe, given the right backing, and shown the faith, he will get it right.
Last season, we were close, so close. Record points total, top scorers in the league and blowing away the top teams.
If they were football men, they could see we are crying out for reinforcements.
And no matter who you like to blame for that position, why aren't they finding the cash from somewhere to fund a couple more forays into the transfer market before the window closes?
As it is we're in the middle of a breakdown but Rafa's the man to get the engine purring again - and, don't forget, he'll soon have the AA to help him too...(sorry).
But seriously, keep the faith, lay off Rafa - oh, and stick this in your window...
* Spending figures from transferleague
Labels:
Aston Villa,
Bookies,
George Gillett,
Rafa Benitez,
Tom Hicks
Monday, 21 April 2008
The Yanks
So, here we are, on the eve of Liverpool FC's third Champions League semi-final in four years. And what are we talking about? The devastating form of Fernando Torres? The fact Steven Gerrard is showing his most consistent form in some time? Or maybe, Rafa Benitez's tactical masterstroke in switching formations - a move that has paid off handsomely at just the right time?No, none of the above. It's still the Yanks. George Gillett and Tom Hicks. The owners. Boardroom people. People in suits. Rick Parry. People, quite frankly, that I don't give a flying about.
Now don't get me wrong, I want them out of the club as much as the next Red. They have let the club down, they have lied and they have conducted themselves in a manner that is just not "The Liverpool Way".
But, for now, I actually want them to STAY. I want them to stay until the end of the season.
And the reason? I think they're helping us towards a sixth European Cup.
Not in the way I would of wanted, I might add. Not because they've stumped up the cash for a string of super signings. Not because they've created a buzz around the club by ensuring work started on the new stadium. Because they haven't.
No, they are helping because lazy football journalists - and news journalists for that matter - are content to write pages and pages of reports about this pair of muppets.
And I think tha
We're playing well. And consistently well. And it's almost like no-one has noticed.
So if Hicks wants to keep on making a mug of himself (see what I did there?) and Gillett and Parry want to stick their chests out for the cameras, let them. If it means a sixth European Cup sitting in the Anfield trophy cabinet it will almost be worth it!
Posted by
robbohuyton
at
13:03
The Yanks
2008-04-21T13:03:00+01:00
robbohuyton
Fernando Torres|George Gillett|journalism.|journalists|Liverpool FC|Rafa Benitez|Rick Parry|Steven Gerrard|The Champions League|Tom Hicks|
Comments
Labels:
Fernando Torres,
George Gillett,
journalism.,
journalists,
Liverpool FC,
Rafa Benitez,
Rick Parry,
Steven Gerrard,
The Champions League,
Tom Hicks
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
