![]() |
Kenny Huang |
What Kenny Huang, Yahaya Kirdi, the Rhone Group and the Al Kharafi family all have in common (if indeed they all have a genuine interest in the club) is they see Liverpool as an opportunity, a brand to be exploited, a supporter base believed to run into the hundreds of millions which can be squeezed.
Super-rich fans that genuinely care for the club have been priced out by the money-mad game but even fiscally-motivated aims can complement those of fans - owners can pocket a profit and bask in the prestige of being associated with the most-decorated club in Britain, we can taste success again and the club can be run in a way befitting of 'The Liverpool Way'.
That's the ideal. But the other side of the coin is Hicks and Gillett. And there's many more like them sniffing out a buck without a care for football. Read David Conn's The Beautiful Game? for an excellent if depressing insight into clubs - and fans - that have been shafted by their owners.
Owners in the modern game care about money. Fans care about the club. The two can and should work together, a fact recognised by UEFA who, according to the FSF, will under Club Licensing and Financial Fair Play Regulations have the obligation to appoint a Supporter Liaison Officer to ensure a dialogue between a club and its fans from 2012.
The rule-makers could go further - in Germany a '50 plus one' rule means clubs will always retain their identity and power because owners can only ever take 49 per cent of control of Bundesliga holding companies. Rules such as these have allowed Bayern Munich - Champions League finalists last season - to stay debt-free and offer tickets for as little as £11.
We shouldn't hold our breath about a similar model being adopted in England any time soon, though. Portsmouth's plummet into administration - and the Championship - after having four owners in a season proves the Premier League's power men are quite happy to leave it alone and allow the financial rat race to continue unchecked. Laissez-faire? What's fair about that?
But there is one way for fans to enjoy greater power in the current set up - own the club themselves. That may seem fanciful given the huge figures being bandied around to buy Liverpool but with the aforementioned hundreds of millions of fans worldwide - why not?
The joining of forces of Liverpool supporters' union Spirit of Shankly and Share Liverpool and the forming of a credit union are steps in the right direction. It will clearly take time but with support from fans it is achievable - Bayern is 80 per cent fan owned, while Barcelona's decisions are taken by a president and board of directors voted for by its 102,000 members, hence the motto "Més que un club" (More than a club).
Dedicated Liverpool fans would argue that LFC is also more than a club. It's certainly more than a business proposition. And that's why supporters - and the Liverpool board - should scrutinise and question every step of a bid to take power at Anfield.
Until match-going fans are involved in decision-making processes, suspicion is healthy for the well-being of the club we all love.
Kirsty_LFC 39p · 764 weeks ago
If Roy was given hundreds of million he wouldn't be buying correctly, instead of buying a player for his ability to fit into the team and his work ethic, it would be soley for his name. I just don't want to see that happen.
Another top article Robbo.
Red · 764 weeks ago
The problem that we've endured at Anfield is fundamentally a result of the failure of the private ownersip model.
Genuine Reds will continue to trust no one with our club except fellow Reds and fan ownership it the only way to achieve that and ensure that the club is run properly.
That should be our objective so that the Moores/Parry and Hicks/Gillett nightmares are never repeated again.
Outright ownership is not necessarily the immediate objective but fans should have the opportunity to acquire equity in the club and should be represented at board level on a democrativ basis.
Eddie · 764 weeks ago
Bill · 764 weeks ago
Sorry but the rest of us want the premiership title and European success.. Yes the supporters owning the club should be something to aspire to but that will be a long term aim at best and easier with a larger fan base, which could be achieved with greater exposure in the Far East.
robbohuyton 61p · 764 weeks ago
petertuckwell · 764 weeks ago
RedMist · 764 weeks ago
Step into the 21st century my friend and stop preaching!
robbohuyton 61p · 764 weeks ago
Steve S · 764 weeks ago
It's about the right players, not just simply the best ones. Real Madrid didn't win the league despite having the 2 previous winners of the world footballer of the year. Barcelona won it with a 20 year old unproven central mid and 22 year old unproven left winger.
Man U don't have the best team, they just know how to play like one. What Roy needs is enough money so he can buy the players he wants, rather than his 3rd choice. it's all we ask for (oh and a new stadium)
Kim Olsen · 764 weeks ago
But if This Huang is serious about taking this club forward, and ready to invest a lot of money in a new stadium and the payers we need, without thinking about making money short term, I'd go for his bid.
Alan Hoey · 764 weeks ago
2. The construction of a new stadium
3. Sensible team investment but the opposite to the Man City model.
4. Supporter interaction and honesty.
Whoever the new owners are and they can provide all four of those things i'll be happy.
robbohuyton 61p · 764 weeks ago
We have received a polite and positive response and have passed on details of the role an SOS-SL supporter stake might ultimately play in the ownership of our Club, and we await developments.
We would all clearly welcome the prospect of the departure of the Club’s present owners. However we also want to make sure that the Club, the directors responsible for overseeing the sales process, as well as the financial institutions involved, are aware of their responsibility to ensure that if the Club is sold, it is sold to the most suitable owners, who have the interests of the Club and its fans at heart. In that event, we would seek supporter involvement in any proposed purchase.
Whilst selling the club, the interests of Liverpool’s supporters must be considered. Supporters make this club what it is, we provide it’s value – financially through branding, merchandising and sponsorship opportunities, and emotionally through unwavering support for our club, the famed “12th man” which makes our club so special. Any prospective new owner should be fully aware of this and we would expect that new owners would seek to develop a mutually co-operative relationship between the supporters, the club and its owners as a matter of urgency and for the benefit of all parties.
With so much speculation and misinformation, we cannot be sure of the intentions and resources of ‘interested parties’. We do understand that Hicks & Gillett's overriding objective will be to sell the club to the highest bidder in order to extract as large a profit as possible. This will not be in the best interest of the club, or the fans and it must not bear influence on who the club is sold to. The club must be sold to those who are ‘fit and proper’ and who will be ‘true custodians’ who have the necessary expertise and resources to restore our great club to its rightful place.
As a consequence, those responsible for overseeing the sale need to ensure that, as a minimum, any new owner is the right person for the football club and it’s supporters, not for the profit they can provide to greed driven businessmen.
The long-term future of this football club, as well as any investment in it, is entirely dependent on the goodwill and support of the fans. Supporter ownership of the Club remains the overriding goal. Should we have new owners, we need to know what role supporters can play, to make sure the problems of the past three years are not repeated and to make sure that supporter issues are heard.
We’ve been in this situation before. The last decision regarding the ownership of Liverpool FC proved to be the most disastrous in the history of the Club. We cannot afford to let anyone else get it wrong again. The supporters can help them get it right.
Make sure you are on board. Make sure your friends are too –tell them about it, pass on the message that we can and will be a part of it. Now more than ever, we have to come together, stand together, and unite to make a change, to protect our club.
Spirit Of Shankly-ShareLiverpoolFC Board
lonelyportrait · 764 weeks ago
Do we really want to turn into another Man Citeh? Not for me.
I do believe that most, if not all of us would simply prefer the club to be in a stable financial state, having enough to fund a few quality signings when needed. Not just any big name but someone who is of quality and 'right' for the club.
We simply want to be able to challenge in terms of finance and competitiveness on the field, for everyone linked with Liverpool to know and understand the traditions of 'The Liverpool Way', not attempting to throw loads of cash around trying to buy trophies and history.
robbohuyton 61p · 764 weeks ago
http://swissramble.blogspot.com/2010/06/how-can-b...
Brandon in TX · 764 weeks ago
Ian L · 763 weeks ago
Mainly because I agree with it!
Fan ownership is the only way forward in my eyes alongside the 50 plus one rule. Let's get it here.
But it's only one step to grabbing back control along with kick offs at 3pm on a Saturday, no investment funds owning clubs, salary caps, ticket price caps, the draft system for promising young players like they have in American football, shared stadiums.
I could go on but you get the general idea.
To those that say it will never happen, that I'm being nostalgic, I say why have you given up? Is it easier to take huge money than consider other options?
I hope the SoS/SL idea comes off. I stick a few quid in it.
M. Lynews · 763 weeks ago
You could be more circumspect yourself in championing fan ownership. Everybody mentions Barca when this subject comes up. Nobody ever says, "Hey, we should be like Athletic Bilbao and Osasuna!"
cheap essay wrіters · 498 weeks ago