Tuesday, 6 July 2010
Backing Hodgson and backing the decision to appoint him are two different things
WHEN Roy Hodgson emerges from the Anfield tunnel on August 14 to take charge of his first Premier League game as Liverpool boss, I’ll be there cheering him on.
But that doesn’t mean I’m happy with his appointment as successor to the axed Rafa Benitez. Far from it. In fact, I can't shake the feeling that it’s a backward step.
Liverpool will be Hodgson’s 17th job as manager – he’s a journeyman, and in 35 years he’s never won a major trophy.
He was sacked by Bristol City, Blackburn, Inter Milan, The UAE and Udinese. Some track record.
And ask yourself this, if Manchester United, Chelsea, Arsenal (even Spurs, Man City and Aston Villa) had been looking for a new boss would they have plumped for Hodgson?
It’s a mediocre appointment because the powers that be at Anfield are accepting the club now has mediocre aims under the stewardship of owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett.
Ok, Hodgson got Fulham punching above their weight. He saved them from relegation, he took them to seventh, he reached the UEFA Cup final.
But Fulham isn’t Liverpool. Liverpool is still the most successful side in England. The club has worldwide support. Off-the-field problems or not, expectations for many fans won’t change. They want the title, cups, Europe. They want attractive football. Hodgson hasn’t got form for delivering any of that at a big club.
At Blackburn he spent £20m on a string of flops and nearly took them down. At Inter Milan the fans pelted him with lighters.
But he’s the LMA manager of the year, right? So? Joe Kinnear, Frank Clark, George Burley and Steve Coppell have also won the award so it’s hardly a benchmark for quality.
It stinks of desperation – a knee-jerk appointment based on one good season with Fulham.
It says it all that Kenny Dalglish made it so clear that he wanted the Liverpool job. He didn’t fancy Hodgson for the job and felt he could do it better himself. The King wanted someone world class in the role, a man who could command respect. A Guus Hiddink, a Jose Mourinho.
A man who could persuade Steven Gerrard, Fernando Torres, Javier Mascherano and others that their future lies at Anfield rather than Real Madrid, Chelsea or Inter Milan.
Such bosses are unrealistic targets maybe, due to the state of the club. But that’s why Kenny was prepared to steer the ship until it reached calmer waters.
Now we have a man who can drive a milkfloat steering a Formula One car and he’s expected to make pole position.
Thank God, Sam Allardyce didn’t have a good season…
More analysis of Roy Hodgson's appointment, Rafa's exit plus exclusive interviews with Rob Jones and celebrity Kopite, actor David Morrissey, in issue three of Well Red.
Comments (57)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Comments by IntenseDebate
Posting anonymously.
Backing Hodgson and backing the decision to appoint him are two different things
2010-07-06T23:14:00+01:00
robbohuyton
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Redlee6963 · 768 weeks ago
AldosLoveChild · 768 weeks ago
miaoow 1p · 768 weeks ago
David · 768 weeks ago
Fatha · 768 weeks ago
Let's give him some time and see how he does, from what I'm reading (paper talk) he's making the right sounds and talking to some good names. Also, if Torres and Gerrard do want to leave (god forbid) then let them, and let's see if we can get the money back to buy in some players that want to play for Liverpool and want to weather our storm.
I personally have had enough of all the doom and gloom of last season and want to start this one as optomistic and positive as possible. Who'll give me good odds on a league and FA cup double? ;)
Jamie · 768 weeks ago
You said Dalglish didnt fancy hodgson for the job although he himself has come out and stated :
"I look very favourably on the appointment. I have known Roy a long time and have a great respect for him".
Also u stated the numerous clubs Hodgson has been sacked from, when again Hodgson stated last week that he's only ever been sacked from one club:
" Blackburn was the only place I have been sacked and that was somewhat harsh. I took a team which had avoided relegation by one point into European football and then lost four of the very best players – three to injury and one to a forced sale to Rangers – the following year".
If your going to criticise our manager who hasnt even had a hame in charge at least state the right facts.
The last thing Hodgson and our team needs is negative thoughts when walking out on opening day against Arsenal. Judge him on his future with Liverpool and not his past (although records show hes been a successfull manager 95% of the time wherever hes been).
torres_mouthpiece · 768 weeks ago
Ste · 768 weeks ago
robbohuyton 61p · 768 weeks ago
I've already said I'll back him, I just don't agree with the board's decision and don't understand how they arrived at their decision.
As for only being sacked by Blackburn? I don't think so. And Dalglish? Well let's just say what he says in public and what he actually thinks appear to be two different things. Look up the comments by his son, speak volumes.
Successful 95%? What's that based on? Depends on your definition of success. I doubt Liverpool fans would tolerate one away win all season.
As for Malmo, sound - a well known breeding ground for world-class managers that.
Anto · 768 weeks ago
There is mo one more cabable of pulling
us out of the mess were in. Most inportant
he is an English man who knows the ways
of the EPL and player relations is second
to none . He may not win much while he is
there but will lay down the foundations
of lfc past for some one younger like J C
or May be sammi himself to greater things
walk on my friends in red
John Toher · 768 weeks ago
Until we get new owners in then we have the best man in to keep things ticking over, dark days at Anfield.
Juan · 768 weeks ago
At least you are making your observation and feelings about Hodgson known now.
And what you say isnt be-belittling Hodgson like some fans on here suggest, it is straight up facts. He has won jack sh*t in his 35 year managerial career, he wasnt the best man for the job and he was only appointed because he wont question the board unlike Rafa.
I admire that you say it as it is yet will still by Hodgson. The fans on here that are calling you out for telling the truth are the very ones who will turn on Roy should he lose 4 games in a row just like many turned on Rafa.
Jamie · 768 weeks ago
Jamie · 768 weeks ago
robbohuyton 61p · 768 weeks ago
As for that shite about if he wasn't good enough - the club is run by bankers, leveraged buy-out experts, people with no football knowledge whatsoever. If you have faith in those people to make the correct decisions about on the field matters, maybe YOU are the type of fan our club doesn't need.
Andy · 768 weeks ago
Torres: "I was happy Hodgson got the job...He did really well at Fulham and I am sure he can do better for Liverpool. He is a very good manager."
Jan Molby: "I think he's a good appointment. I like Roy Hodgson as a manager and he knows what it takes."
Ian Rush: "I know Roy quite well and it's a good appointment. Tactically, he's very astute, he's highly respected across Europe and if you look at his CV he's been everywhere. He's proved himself at club and international level and has managed big clubs like Inter Milan."
Kenny Dalglish: "I look very favourably on the appointment. I have known Roy a long time and have a great respect for him."
robbohuyton 61p · 768 weeks ago
Jamie · 768 weeks ago
Jamie · 768 weeks ago
Jamie · 768 weeks ago
Jamie · 768 weeks ago
Jamie · 768 weeks ago
robbohuyton 61p · 768 weeks ago
Jamie · 768 weeks ago
robbohuyton 61p · 768 weeks ago
The whole point is he will be supported but the appointment is questionable for a supposed top-four club. You don't seem able to grasp this so I'll leave it there.