Leftover article from issue two of Well Red magazine: www.wellredmag.co.uk
Wednesday, 19 May 2010
Jamie Redknapp: Guilty of crimes against punditry and Liverpool FC
THE THOMAS Cook advert was bad enough.
You know the one, where Jamie Redknapp prances round the beach with no top on, playing golf shots into the sea.
He might not play for us anymore but he’s a former Liverpool captain – we’re guilty by association.
Opposing fans across the land, once they’ve taken their fingers out of their throats, must chuckle every time they see it – I know I would if it was an ex-Manc.
So that’s Jamie Redknapp the sell-out – what about Jamie Redknapp the pundit?
Well, he’s not one is he?
A pundit, according to the Oxford Dictionary, is ‘an expert in a particular subject or field who is frequently called upon to give their opinion to the public’.
Tune into La Liga coverage and watch Guillem Balague – there’s a pundit, right there. He knows his onions, he’s done his research - he even pronounces the players’ names right and can throw the odd witty comment into the mix. All in his second language, too.
Then there’s Jamie Redknapp. Comparing the tight-kecked pretty boy to Balague is like comparing Fernando Torres and Victor Anichebe.
They might do the same job but the gap in ability is easier to see than Alex Ferguson’s nose on a winter’s day.
Redknapp, Harry’s son of course, has been sticking the boot in on the club he played hundreds of sideway passes for on a regular basis this last season.
Fair enough, you might say, it was a disappointing campaign after all.
No argument, but if you’re going to dish out stick - and get paid well for the privilege – you’ve got to get your facts right.
Get them wrong and your arguments look thinner than one of Jamie’s ties. Angrily perched on the couch during Sky’s coverage of Liverpool’s league defeat at Old Trafford in March, Redknapp told the millions that Liverpool have missed Xabi Alonso.
Nothing new there then, just the repeating of an over-stated viewpoint that has been doing the rounds all season.
But he went on to say that the Reds would particularly miss him at Old Trafford – because he had been so influential the year before in the 4-1 routing of Slur Alex’s side.
“Xabi Alonso was sensational spreading the ball to Fernando Torres and Steven Gerrard that day,” he told viewers in a gaffe Garth Crooks would be proud of.
Of course Alonso didn’t play that day due to injury.
To use the clichéd commentary, Jamie is so fond of – it’s a schoolboy error. Maybe he should leave the Wii-playing to his old fella and the missus and do a bit of research once in a while?
To close the case against Redknapp, we must look at his favourite word. Literally.
Gems include: "He's LITERALLY left Ben Haim for dead there" and “Gerrard has been amazing. He’s literally covered every blade of grass on the pitch”
And who can forget: “Alonso and Sissoko have been picked to literally sit in front of the back four.”
Like ‘loyalty’, Jamie clearly doesn’t know the meaning of the word ‘literally’. There’s even a Facebook petition to have him taught its correct use.
So for crimes against Liverpool Football Club and football punditry, we find Redknapp guilty. And for his punishment we propose a month of eating McDonalds three times a day.
That way his arse wouldn’t fit into those spray on kecks, the women will turn off, and there’ll be even less of a point to him being on the couch at Sky.
Leftover article from issue two of Well Red magazine: www.wellredmag.co.uk
Leftover article from issue two of Well Red magazine: www.wellredmag.co.uk
Comments (40)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Comments by IntenseDebate
Posting anonymously.
Jamie Redknapp: Guilty of crimes against punditry and Liverpool FC
2010-05-19T00:37:00+01:00
robbohuyton
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Peter Parker · 775 weeks ago
geoff · 775 weeks ago
Have some respect!
Jon · 775 weeks ago
adz · 775 weeks ago
john toher · 775 weeks ago
Sack the sicknote saddo
hugh yao · 775 weeks ago
vanan · 775 weeks ago
Connjam · 775 weeks ago
Drew · 775 weeks ago
Lee · 775 weeks ago
Guillem Balague on the other hand is just Rafa's biatch and acts as a sounding board for Rafa whenever he wants to big himself up and maybe play media games with the club.
Suffice to say that I would rather listen to Redknapp over Balague any day of the week
Weatherall · 775 weeks ago
you retards, wake up and realize that pundits that use to play for us are speaking the truth, they want whats best for the club
Daveyboy · 775 weeks ago
Not only does he stick the knife in every chance he gets, he's completely hypocritical (Rafa leaving Keane on the bench was practically criminal; when his dad did exactly the same, not a fucking word), and can't even take the time to get his facts right before weighing in (ok, this last one is par for the course for most pundits, but it doesn't excuse it - if you're handsomely paid for your opinion the least you can do is some basic research).
Weatherall · 775 weeks ago
nice one dick head
guess people cant make a mistake without becoming a complete moron.
Weatherall · 775 weeks ago
who gives a shit about your shit club anyway, we won the double :)
chelsea chelsea, chelsea chelsea
Jack · 775 weeks ago
1) Pele has been derided for many of his comments. A great player but not taken that seriously when it comes to knowledge of the game
2)Rednapp has been riduculed by LFC fans long before his anti- Rafa campaign. He loves the club but is naeive to say the least. He is being riduculed here because of his mistakes and lack of insight of the game not because ppl support Rafa. Also his total devotion to getting Rafa out by any means is the reason for this article.
3) To the idiot who says they would rather listen to Redknapp than Ballague, its like a 5 year old wanting to listen to S Club 7 rather than a Beethoven symphony.
Redallover · 775 weeks ago
Mike · 775 weeks ago
He uses his position to promote family members and friends and to criticise those he dislikes. He does not have the bottle to go into management and he was an average player (and regular sicknote) for Liverpool. In sum, he is an idiot. If I see him on the tv, I turn over.
gav03 · 775 weeks ago
dfg · 775 weeks ago
Neil · 775 weeks ago
JR made those stupid Alonso comments because The Moses of Premiership Football Andy Gray said almost the exact same thing during his game commentary. Not only did nobody pull Frasier Crane up about this gaffe, but Redknapp - a former Liverpool captain and a member of the midfielder's union - went even further by taking it as gospel and even inventing fictitious cross-field passes!
In general though, JR just prattles along, filling airspace with vacuous observations that most football fans could make, and turns the question over to the guest as soon as he realises he's in a cul-de-sac without getting anywhere near his destination. As much as I hate Andy Gray, at least he's willing to throw some contentious opinions out there - JR is just a long noise in a shiny suit.
I suppose Sky are just grateful that there's a pundit out there willing to give up every weekend and a few week nights to help pad out their shows. Personally, if I was married to Louise Nurding I think I'd want to spend a bit more time at home, but that's probably something for a different blog!
Julia Smith · 775 weeks ago
Sadly very few of those people are working in football broadcasting. And Redknapp's definitely - literally - not one of those people.
Jack · 775 weeks ago
You mean telling everyone how Alonso played brilliantly in a match he did not take part in? So Alonso was playing but just happened to be playing in with an invisible cloak. You GIMP!
Don · 775 weeks ago
Julia Smith · 775 weeks ago
Michael Owen was a great player. But would you want to listen to him talk about football? I'd literally rather eat my own eyes!
And don't even get me started on Collymore...
Neil · 775 weeks ago