Ironic that my feelings on modern-day football can be summed up by something penned by a fan of Manchester City, a club, which like Chelsea, is fast becoming the epitome of the game in the current era.
Noel Gallagher's lyrics to Columbia seem to perfectly pinpoint my thoughts on where Liverpool, and the game in general, finds itself.

But now it's less about the football, more about the money.
And while Chelsea and Manchester City fans smugly smile at being bankrolled by foreign zillionaires who haven't put a penny on to the club's debts, Liverpool and Manchester United fans wince as their owners create doom and gloom headlines with their carpetbagging antics.
Pausing at Liverpool for a moment, as a fan I honestly don't know what I want anymore. Obviously, success - isn't that what every football fan craves? But what price that success - the soul of the club?

I'm not sure I do, where's the fun in that? But it's hardly laugh-a-minute under Liverpool's current owners who seem to be taking the club nowhere but backwards, so what now?
Who can sort out this mess and what do us fans want?
Someone who respects the traditions of the club, won't pile debt on to it, will build a stadium, fund transfer buys at the top end of the market and keep ticket prices low? It's a big ask.
Whatever happens, some repair work is essential to restore things to how they once where at Anfield, on and off the pitch.
Even the relationship between fans is on a downward spiral. Has there ever been so many factions in the Liverpool support? There's anti-owners and pro-owners, anti-Benitez and pro-Benitez - it's gone from throwing insults to throwing punches in some cases, all because there's no blanket agreement on the best way forward for the club...
"There we were, now here we are, all this confusion, nothing's the same to me..."
But don't get me wrong, this isn't just about Liverpool, or the painful reign of Tom Hicks and George Gillett. And I'm not just ranting away because of our disappointing season so far (although it hasn't helped, obviously).
No, there's wider concerns for me, like football in general, where is it going?
Look at recent events - Portsmouth struggling to pay wages, fans snubbing the FA Cup, clubs struggling for sponsors. There's plenty of speculation about who will be next to "do a Leeds" after the Yorkshire club famously plummeted into administration after making it to the semi final of the Champions League.
Even away from the woes of individual clubs, there's the Premier League itself. Since it was formed in 1992, only four teams have ever won it - Manchester United, Chelsea, Arsenal and Blackburn.
The league was formed under the pretence of being for the benefit of the game, coming with promises such as an 18-team competition - an idea which was supposed to benefit the national side. Seventeen years later, it's still 20 teams.
The truth is the birth of the Premier League was all about the money - it was a move which meant the big teams got bigger and the little teams fell further behind.
The established clubs puffed out their chests, negotiated huge TV deals with no trickle down to the grass roots, and now we have a watered-down version of what was once a genuine competition.
Look at the predictability of the top four, the struggle by promoted sides to compete and the boom in players' wages.
When even the average Premier League salary, according to the PFA, comes in at almost three times that of the Prime Minister and more than 28 times that of a police officer, is it any wonder?
Just 10 years ago, Michael Owen and Robbie Fowler were among the top earners in the top flight, pocketing £30,000 a week. Now, as infamously revealed on the internet, average players like John Arne Riise can pick up that money while top players bank four or five times that amount.
So where does it end? When does it stop? Where's the line in the sand? From a fans' perspective it's already changed beyond recognition. Supporters are older and richer than they ever were with the younger and less fortunate fan left on the outside looking in.
Because as wages and transfer fees keep on rising, so do the ticket prices.
Clubs bank on fans' loyalty but everyone has a breaking point. Research last year estimated that one in four Premier League season ticket holders are planning on cancelling their ticket next season whilst one in ten are planning on sharing the cost of next season’s ticket with a friend.
Virgin Money’s Football Fans’ Inflation Index revealed that the rising cost of following Premier League football coupled with the economic recession is prompting supporters to cut back on their football spending.
The survey also revealed that the average cost of following a football team in the Premier League, including match tickets, replica shirts, transport, food and drink, now amounted to £95.60 per game - an increase of almost 23% since 2006.
It can't go on indefinitely, it's surely not sustainable, but what will stop it?
Well, aside from a really big club going pop and providing a huge wake-up call for everyone else, it requires the powers that be to grow a pair and do something.
It's all well and good Michel Platini and Sepp Blatter throwing themselves around their plush offices talking about salary caps and homegrown players quotas (both good in theory, both a nightmare to put in place) but they're like the spoilt kids at the nursery...
Everyone ignores them and carries on playing.
Growler · 792 weeks ago
Ian · 792 weeks ago
Portsmouth must surely go 'pop' sooner or later.
john jones · 751 weeks ago
Graham Matheson · 792 weeks ago
@socialknight · 791 weeks ago
Since then of course ticket prices have gone silly, pricing out those without the wherewithal pay the prices, the annual membership etc. so that as you say supporters are richer and older while some of most ardent fans are in pubs watching but often branded arm chair supporters because they don't get to the game.
I often wonder if these fans were able to go to the match if the atmostphere would be better at some Anfield games? Of course even more seats at a 'new stadium' would have to be affordable or they could remain empty and pubs full for many matches.
The date of my last season ticket (91/92) was of course the last of the First Division Championships which of course Leeds Utd won....I too worry that we could be that club that goes 'pop' - I bloody hope not.
@socialknight · 791 weeks ago
Ian L · 791 weeks ago
I've felt that way about footy for the last year or so. For me, it's a combination of things - wages, ticket prices, rescheduled matches to suit Sky, rubbish atmosphere at the match.
The bubble is defo bursting - Liverpool emailed me the other day, practically begging me to buy tickets for the Reading FA Cup replay! That wouldn't have happened a few years ago and it's not all down to the recession.
I used to laugh at the SPL, saying it was a 2 horse race but that's exactly what the EPL has become (even a 1 horse race some seasons).
I don't know how to fix it but something needs to be done. I have jotted down some ideas below. Some of you will pick holes in it (cos we're British and that's what we do - moan) but let's have some more.
*No more buying and selling of clubs - all football clubs to be fan-owned under new legislation
*Stunts like Chelsea's turning debt into equity (to get round UEFA debt rules) to be illegal and clubs banned from Euro competition for 5 years.
* All football matches to kick off on a Saturday at 3pm.
*Tapping up/poaching of players/bribing parents by buying houses and cars to get young player to sign to be punished with automatic 30 point deduction.
*Wages cap - like in rugby league. It might drive the best players away but if you can't afford them, then you can't afford them. Clubs begin to live within their means again.
*Drop ticket prices by 33% - if the wage bill drops because of above, then the ticket prices can drop.
*Draft system - like in the NFL (where the best youth players go to last season's bottom side in an attempt to to level out sides).
*No more than three foreign players in side - this might be illegal under EU law and freedom of movement and all that, but surely some legal brain can find a way round it?
*Premiership TV coverage to join the protected jewels like Wimbledon etc and to be shown on terrestrial TV. Sky told to stick its money.
That will do for starters.
HHHarry · 791 weeks ago
But I have a few ideas which wouldn't too hard to implement but we should give teams 4 years to start them.
1. Less live football. I think the odd game shown on a Sunday is enough. Does amy remember sitting around the radio listening to the live game. It was religious, especially when you now millions of other worshippers were doing the same.
2. More games on at 3 o'clock on a Saturday. Bring it back and bring it back now.
3. Top league to 18 teams - less games, less average players, better football.
4.A team salary cap based on all 18 teams in the league and not just a teams money intake as this would allow the rich teams to buy the best players and continue to monopolise the football world. Something along the lines of the Aussie rules system.
5.No more buying players as teenagers and loaning them out. If a team buys a player they have to keep them.
6. A quota on the number of players in each section of the club, ie First Team Squad, Reserve and Youth. This stops the top teams buying so many young players in the hope that one of them becomes a star or even good enough to sell on at a profit.
The problem is that if England are the only country to do something along these lines it will need a complete mind set change for the English fans and players. It might be a bit harder to implement over the world.
Just a few thoughts but I think football will be dead soon unless something is done.
robbohuyton 61p · 791 weeks ago
Matt Shaw · 791 weeks ago
Wage caps are going to have to come in at some point surely? It needs to be a worldwide thing though - otherwise you can see dubai etc.. setting up their own teams and bribing the best players with huge wages. As it is in Rugby, by my understanding, the English players are all tempted over to France where there is no wage cap.
I also agree with the clubs being owned by the fans, but not sure how this could be put in place.
I was thinking earlier whether I'd prefer to be Manchester City at this point in time. Would I want us to win the title if we'd just bought it like Chelsea did and City are trying to? Do I want a mega rich owner to come along, or would I just rather we stayed within the revenue the club can generate? It's a tough one, but my principles tell me I'd rather we were just living within our means.
mcdonaldtaf 19p · 791 weeks ago
In relation to our owners I'm unsure if they are bumbling buffoons or are dealing with a long term plan, hindered by the credit crunch. If it is the latter then we may simply be going through the painful part of the long term plan.
Ideal owners? I still stand by my idea of a flotation with shareliverpool/sos holding a big enough equity % so it can't go private again, H&G still keeping a large (but not controlling) stake for a return and the rest being owned by other fans and businesses. This would bring in the required investment and would impose additional controls to ensure our financial viability.
Arl arse · 791 weeks ago
The only waa forward for us would appear to be a similatrscenario to what's happened at Man City,but whilst I'd like to see us back at the top of the game I don't really want it to be as a result of that happeneing.I think I'd prefer us to do a Leeds to be honest.
Rupie Fowler · 791 weeks ago
So before we do go 'pop, what are your thoughts on us Liverpool fans 'doing a Barcelona' and letting the fans buy/run the club ?
robbohuyton 61p · 791 weeks ago
SAM · 780 weeks ago
Will · 771 weeks ago
It seems to me like a lot of the power is leaving the Premier League and going to La Liga, and I feel like it's been that way for a while now.
I just started a blog, if any of you guys are interested. Most recent post is about Mourinho.
Lenny · 757 weeks ago